<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free Software 2.0.0.9 builds now also available&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://oduinn.com/2007/11/05/free-software-2009-builds-now-also-available/</link>
	<description>...my CyberSoapBox!</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 22:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: MJR/blog: debian</title>
		<link>http://oduinn.com/2007/11/05/free-software-2009-builds-now-also-available/#comment-8</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 12:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://oduinn.com/2007/11/05/free-software-2009-builds-now-also-available/#comment-8</guid>
					<description>[...] This follows last year's problems with Mozilla packages.  FTP.mozilla.org now has a (Not-?)Firefox 2.0.0.9 "compiled with branding, logos and talkback removed" according to John O'Duinn's Soapbox - download non-automated en-US free-software builds.  Is this really free? What does it mean for Debian's Iceweasel and GNU's Iceweasel if so? I guess the GNU one will keep going, to avoid the auto-installation of non-free plugins, but it might allow more work to be shared. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] This follows last year&#8217;s problems with Mozilla packages.  <a href="http://FTP.mozilla.org" rel="nofollow">FTP.mozilla.org</a> now has a (Not-?)Firefox 2.0.0.9 &#8220;compiled with branding, logos and talkback removed&#8221; according to John O&#8217;Duinn&#8217;s Soapbox - download non-automated en-US free-software builds.  Is this really free? What does it mean for Debian&#8217;s Iceweasel and GNU&#8217;s Iceweasel if so? I guess the GNU one will keep going, to avoid the auto-installation of non-free plugins, but it might allow more work to be shared. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
