<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Housekeeping: Moving performance tests from Tinderbox to Talos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oduinn.com/2008/02/04/housekeeping-moving-performance-tests-from-tinderbox-to-talos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oduinn.com/blog/2008/02/04/housekeeping-moving-performance-tests-from-tinderbox-to-talos/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oxymoronical &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Visualising our Labours</title>
		<link>http://oduinn.com/blog/2008/02/04/housekeeping-moving-performance-tests-from-tinderbox-to-talos/#comment-606</link>
		<dc:creator>Oxymoronical &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Visualising our Labours</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oduinn.com/2008/02/04/housekeeping-moving-performance-tests-from-tinderbox-to-talos/#comment-606</guid>
		<description>[...] First off there is the old-style performance machines, pre-talos. These often find regressions first, because they cycle fast. Apparently that is going to improve but until then these old machines have useful data. Unfortunately the graphs they produce are &#8230; well lets just say pig ugly! It didn&#8217;t take too long to knock up something very basic, but nicer looking and allowing multiple results on the same graph. You can see it graphing the live data (yes it will appear blank for the age it takes to draw). Unfortunately the graph kit I&#8217;m using seems a little slow and not all that functional, but that could be changed. Then again I have just found out that new work on the graphs server pretty much blows this out of the water! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] First off there is the old-style performance machines, pre-talos. These often find regressions first, because they cycle fast. Apparently that is going to improve but until then these old machines have useful data. Unfortunately the graphs they produce are &#8230; well lets just say pig ugly! It didn&#8217;t take too long to knock up something very basic, but nicer looking and allowing multiple results on the same graph. You can see it graphing the live data (yes it will appear blank for the age it takes to draw). Unfortunately the graph kit I&#8217;m using seems a little slow and not all that functional, but that could be changed. Then again I have just found out that new work on the graphs server pretty much blows this out of the water! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John O&#8217;Duinn&#8217;s Soapbox &#187; Housekeeping: Moving performance tests from Tinderbox to Talos (followup)</title>
		<link>http://oduinn.com/blog/2008/02/04/housekeeping-moving-performance-tests-from-tinderbox-to-talos/#comment-586</link>
		<dc:creator>John O&#8217;Duinn&#8217;s Soapbox &#187; Housekeeping: Moving performance tests from Tinderbox to Talos (followup)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oduinn.com/2008/02/04/housekeeping-moving-performance-tests-from-tinderbox-to-talos/#comment-586</guid>
		<description>[...] Last week, I blogged about us looking at old running systems and figuring out which ones could be shutdown. One set of machines were some old tinderbox performance machines, set up as a quick workaround well over a year ago(!). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last week, I blogged about us looking at old running systems and figuring out which ones could be shutdown. One set of machines were some old tinderbox performance machines, set up as a quick workaround well over a year ago(!). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

