<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Upgrading a Firefox 1.0.7 user</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oduinn.com/2008/12/26/upgrading-a-firefox-107-user/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oduinn.com/blog/2008/12/26/upgrading-a-firefox-107-user/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 14:30:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://oduinn.com/blog/2008/12/26/upgrading-a-firefox-107-user/#comment-14459</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 21:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oduinn.com/2008/12/26/upgrading-a-firefox-107-user/#comment-14459</guid>
		<description>&quot;Tabs? Memory improvements? JS performance improvements? Awesome bar? Phishing protection?&quot;
That&#039;s exactly the problem: For an end user the difference between 1.0 and 3.x is not that big. Most improvements happened under the hood and they only recognize that booting FF3 now takes longer. I&#039;ve had this frustrating experience with end users more than once...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Tabs? Memory improvements? JS performance improvements? Awesome bar? Phishing protection?&#8221;<br />
That&#8217;s exactly the problem: For an end user the difference between 1.0 and 3.x is not that big. Most improvements happened under the hood and they only recognize that booting FF3 now takes longer. I&#8217;ve had this frustrating experience with end users more than once&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://oduinn.com/blog/2008/12/26/upgrading-a-firefox-107-user/#comment-14454</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 19:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oduinn.com/2008/12/26/upgrading-a-firefox-107-user/#comment-14454</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a hard one.  Any one of the things you listed are huge reasons to upgrade (well, with the exception of tabs, they&#039;ve been in there since Phoenix 0.1 ;-) ).

So what one change would I choose?  It would depend on who I was talking to.

If I were talking to me, it would definitely be the Awesome bar.  I&#039;ve been using Fx 3 since before it was officially released, and I still smile every time I use the Awesome bar.  I can&#039;t live without it.

For anyone else (unless I knew they had a specific hot button), I would probably choose phishing protection, but I would explain it as &quot;Firefox protects you from bad stuff on the Internet, so you never have to worry about junk getting on your computer and messing it up or slowing it down.&quot;  As you can see, I talk to mostly non-technical people.  :-)

But normally when I&#039;m trying to get someone to switch (and without the artificial constraint), I go with something like, &quot;it&#039;s much faster than Internet Explorer, protects you from all kinds of bad stuff out there--and let me show you what you can do with this thing they call the Awesome bar!&quot;

If that doesn&#039;t work and they&#039;re middle aged or older, I show then ForecastFox.  That usually seals the deal.  :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a hard one.  Any one of the things you listed are huge reasons to upgrade (well, with the exception of tabs, they&#8217;ve been in there since Phoenix 0.1 <img src='http://oduinn.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  ).</p>
<p>So what one change would I choose?  It would depend on who I was talking to.</p>
<p>If I were talking to me, it would definitely be the Awesome bar.  I&#8217;ve been using Fx 3 since before it was officially released, and I still smile every time I use the Awesome bar.  I can&#8217;t live without it.</p>
<p>For anyone else (unless I knew they had a specific hot button), I would probably choose phishing protection, but I would explain it as &#8220;Firefox protects you from bad stuff on the Internet, so you never have to worry about junk getting on your computer and messing it up or slowing it down.&#8221;  As you can see, I talk to mostly non-technical people.  <img src='http://oduinn.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But normally when I&#8217;m trying to get someone to switch (and without the artificial constraint), I go with something like, &#8220;it&#8217;s much faster than Internet Explorer, protects you from all kinds of bad stuff out there&#8211;and let me show you what you can do with this thing they call the Awesome bar!&#8221;</p>
<p>If that doesn&#8217;t work and they&#8217;re middle aged or older, I show then ForecastFox.  That usually seals the deal.  <img src='http://oduinn.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://oduinn.com/blog/2008/12/26/upgrading-a-firefox-107-user/#comment-14453</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 19:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oduinn.com/2008/12/26/upgrading-a-firefox-107-user/#comment-14453</guid>
		<description>See, I was unaware of the fact that tabbed browsing only came to Firefox post-1.0.7. When was it added?

Anyway, that would definitely be the number one improvement over a non-tabbed browsing version of Firefox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, I was unaware of the fact that tabbed browsing only came to Firefox post-1.0.7. When was it added?</p>
<p>Anyway, that would definitely be the number one improvement over a non-tabbed browsing version of Firefox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deb</title>
		<link>http://oduinn.com/blog/2008/12/26/upgrading-a-firefox-107-user/#comment-14452</link>
		<dc:creator>deb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oduinn.com/2008/12/26/upgrading-a-firefox-107-user/#comment-14452</guid>
		<description>If I had to pick just one, I&#039;d say &quot;awesomebar&quot; because it has absolutely changed how I use my browser.  But there are so many others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I had to pick just one, I&#8217;d say &#8220;awesomebar&#8221; because it has absolutely changed how I use my browser.  But there are so many others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MT</title>
		<link>http://oduinn.com/blog/2008/12/26/upgrading-a-firefox-107-user/#comment-14450</link>
		<dc:creator>MT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 17:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oduinn.com/2008/12/26/upgrading-a-firefox-107-user/#comment-14450</guid>
		<description>For me as web developer, huge *Gecko rendering engine improvements*â€”including Reflow refactoring, CSS support improvements, tons of bugfixes and some useful features like soft hyphen supportâ€”are most valuable changes in Firefox since version 1.0. Awesomebar is quite nice feature too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me as web developer, huge *Gecko rendering engine improvements*â€”including Reflow refactoring, CSS support improvements, tons of bugfixes and some useful features like soft hyphen supportâ€”are most valuable changes in Firefox since version 1.0. Awesomebar is quite nice feature too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julien</title>
		<link>http://oduinn.com/blog/2008/12/26/upgrading-a-firefox-107-user/#comment-14449</link>
		<dc:creator>Julien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 17:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oduinn.com/2008/12/26/upgrading-a-firefox-107-user/#comment-14449</guid>
		<description>I would choose tags. Tags are really useful.
As a Linux user, i would have to say the integration with the system, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would choose tags. Tags are really useful.<br />
As a Linux user, i would have to say the integration with the system, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorus</title>
		<link>http://oduinn.com/blog/2008/12/26/upgrading-a-firefox-107-user/#comment-14443</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 12:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oduinn.com/2008/12/26/upgrading-a-firefox-107-user/#comment-14443</guid>
		<description>Best new feature? Difficult...

Reorder tab is high on my list for sure, followed by session restore. Beside that i&#039;m probably going to need a list of changes between 1.07 and 3.05, as the best change is probably one i can&#039;t even remember :)

Ofcourse another big one is the huge list of extensions available these days, but that&#039;s not really a new feature :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best new feature? Difficult&#8230;</p>
<p>Reorder tab is high on my list for sure, followed by session restore. Beside that i&#8217;m probably going to need a list of changes between 1.07 and 3.05, as the best change is probably one i can&#8217;t even remember <img src='http://oduinn.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Ofcourse another big one is the huge list of extensions available these days, but that&#8217;s not really a new feature <img src='http://oduinn.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Da Scritch</title>
		<link>http://oduinn.com/blog/2008/12/26/upgrading-a-firefox-107-user/#comment-14438</link>
		<dc:creator>Da Scritch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 10:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oduinn.com/2008/12/26/upgrading-a-firefox-107-user/#comment-14438</guid>
		<description>Pfffiiiooouuu

I miss 0.9.1 because of its contextual navigation toolbar. We don&#039;t have it anymore and that&#039;s sad. Some websites were very useful with. The Links Widgets is not enough.
In 0.9.8, we lose on the fly theme changing. Now, we have to start again, as in MS-Windows.

Between 1.0.7 and 3.0.7 ?
Heeeeemmm.

Memorizing opened tabs. And reopening ones we just closed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pfffiiiooouuu</p>
<p>I miss 0.9.1 because of its contextual navigation toolbar. We don&#8217;t have it anymore and that&#8217;s sad. Some websites were very useful with. The Links Widgets is not enough.<br />
In 0.9.8, we lose on the fly theme changing. Now, we have to start again, as in MS-Windows.</p>
<p>Between 1.0.7 and 3.0.7 ?<br />
Heeeeemmm.</p>
<p>Memorizing opened tabs. And reopening ones we just closed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Naylor</title>
		<link>http://oduinn.com/blog/2008/12/26/upgrading-a-firefox-107-user/#comment-14437</link>
		<dc:creator>David Naylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 09:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oduinn.com/2008/12/26/upgrading-a-firefox-107-user/#comment-14437</guid>
		<description>Wow, I wouldn&#039;t know where to start either. I think you chose a good feature to explain though, since it will produce dialogs every now and then that your friend will have to click through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I wouldn&#8217;t know where to start either. I think you chose a good feature to explain though, since it will produce dialogs every now and then that your friend will have to click through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Scott Scheel</title>
		<link>http://oduinn.com/blog/2008/12/26/upgrading-a-firefox-107-user/#comment-14435</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Scott Scheel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 08:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oduinn.com/2008/12/26/upgrading-a-firefox-107-user/#comment-14435</guid>
		<description>Speed improvements, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speed improvements, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

